USPTO serial 75878123
YNRBRANDING.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, DOUGLAS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with YNRBRANDING.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JEFFREY C. KATZ, Esq.
JEFFREY C KATZ ESQ DAVIS & GILBERT LLP1740 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | ADVERTISING AGENCY SERVICES; DIRECT MARKETING SERVICES; MARKET RESEARCH SERVICES; MARKETING SERVICES, NAMELY PROMOTING THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS BY PREPARING AND PLACING ADVERTISEMENTS FOR DISSEMINATION THROUGH TELEVISION AND RADIO COMMERCIALS, DIRECT MAIL, PRINT PUBLICATIONS, BILLBOARDS, VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK AND OTHER MEDIA OUTLETS; CONDUCTING MARKET RESEARCH SURVEYS; MARKET AND COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS SERVICES; DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF MARKETING STRATEGIES FOR OTHERS; BUSINESS CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELDS OF ADVERTISING, MARKETING, MARKETING COMMUNICATIONS, CORPORATE IDENTITY DEVELOPMENT, PRODUCT BRANDING, STRATEGIC BRANDING, BRAND POSITIONING AND PRODUCT PROMOTION; CREATING, EVALUATING, AND MANAGING BRAND NAMES, TRADEMARKS, SERVICE MARKS AND BUSINESS NAMES FOR OTHERS | ACTIVE | Sep 8, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 3, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 13, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 28, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 4, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 26, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |