USPTO serial 75878198
LAP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WINTER, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LAP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jerry W. Mills
JERRY W MILLS BAKER & BOTTS LLP2001 ROSS AVEDALLAS, TX 75201-8001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRONIC CIRCUITS AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR PROCESSING DATA RECEIVED FROM DEVICES CAPABLE OF MEASURING ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 11, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 10, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 12, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 16, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 17, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 25, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 26, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 17, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |