Drawing for INFOMINERS.COM

USPTO serial 75878479

INFOMINERS.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
THOMPKINS, TRICIA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INFOMINERS.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RICHARD J. GROOS

RICHARD J GROOS FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI LLP600 CONGRESS AVESTE 2400AUSTIN, TX 78701

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for data warehousing and for decision supportACTIVEOct 15, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 13, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Mar 18, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 18, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 5, 2001UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED
Oct 22, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 4, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 3, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 6, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 25, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 23, 2001REINREINSTATED
Mar 7, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 5, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 23, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance