USPTO serial 75878556
THE GARNISHING MACHINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 26, 2002
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE GARNISHING MACHINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Rancho Dominquez, CA
Rancho Dominquez, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL W. HICKS
MICHAEL W HICKS BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN LLP12400 WILSHIRE BLVD 7TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90025-1026UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | food slicing machine | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 24, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 26, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 24, 2001 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 24, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 22, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 20, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |