Drawing for EZCONNECT

USPTO serial 75878924

EZCONNECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 600: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with EZCONNECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William N. Hulsey III

ALLYN TAYLOR DLA PIPER RUDNICK GRAY CARY US LLP2000 UNIVERSITY AVEEAST PALO ALTO, CA 94303-2248UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR USE IN THE COMMUNICATION OF AUTOMOTIVE PART ORDERSACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 15, 2005PR.WPETITION TO REVIVE WITHDRAWN
Feb 11, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Feb 11, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Feb 4, 2005PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED
Jan 21, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Sep 1, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 19, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Aug 12, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Aug 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 10, 2004LEXTLATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST
Aug 10, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 2, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Feb 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 3, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 11, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 22, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 5, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 21, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Dec 15, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 16, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jun 8, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 26, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 25, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance