USPTO serial 75878928
VIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James N. Kallis
JAMES N KALLIS BROOKS & KUSHMAN PC1000 TOWN CTR TWENTY-SECOND FLSOUTHFIELD, MI 48075UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| B | THE CERTIFICATION MARK, AS USED BY AUTHORIZED PERSONS, CERTIFIES THAT PERSONS USING THE MARK HAVE ACHIEVED A SPECIFIC LEVEL OF EDUCATION, TRAINING, EXPERIENCE, AND ACHIEVEMENT FOR QUALITY CONSULTING IN THE FIELD OF ENGINEERING, AUDITING, MANUFACTURING, HEALTH SERVICE, CUSTOMER SERVICE, MANAGEMENT, OR ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ACCORDING TO STANDARDS ESTABLISHED BY THE CERTIFIER | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2002 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| May 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |