USPTO serial 75879125
TOTAL VALUE CREATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3598830Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 31, 2009
- Examiner
- FIRST, VIVIAN M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TOTAL VALUE CREATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
The Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by The Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants
The Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by The Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
AMANDA H WILCOX
AMANDA H WILCOX Hahn Loeser & ParksOne GOJO PlazaSuite 300Akron, OH 44311-1076Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Financial analysis and consultation in the field of measuring and improving the totality of value created by businesses for all of their stakeholders, and verifying the level of the totality of such value created | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 7, 2008 |
| 042 | Promoting the public awareness and appreciation for the skills of chartered accountants in performing the services of assisting businesses to measure and improve the totality of value created by such businesses for all of their stakeholders and verifying the level of the totality of such value created | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 7, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TVC INTERNATIONAL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by TVC INTERNATIONAL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by The Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants
- Other trademarks owned by The Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named TOTAL VALUE CREATION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 26, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 30, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2008 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 9, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 9, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 30, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 10, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 10, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 10, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 9, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 23, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 5, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 5, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 5, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 8, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 16, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 15, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 26, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 20, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 29, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 7, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 8, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 27, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |