Drawing for POWER-ZYMES

USPTO serial 75879167

POWER-ZYMES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DALIER, JOHN DAVID
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POWER-ZYMES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN S. EGBERT

JOHN S EGBERT HARRISON & EGBERT412 MAIN ST FL 7HOUSTON, TX 77002-1838UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005dietary supplementsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 11, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Apr 10, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 7, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Apr 6, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Feb 17, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 6, 2004EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Aug 3, 2004CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Jul 6, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 7, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 17, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 12, 2004CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Apr 5, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Apr 1, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Apr 1, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Sep 23, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 2, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 4, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2002UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED
Nov 14, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 2, 2001UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED
May 26, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
May 18, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance