USPTO serial 75879503
UNIVERSE CITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with UNIVERSE CITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GRETCHEN R STROUD
GRETCHEN R STROUD COOLEY GODWARD LLPFIVE PALO ALTA SQ3000 EL CAMINO REALPALO ALTO, CA 94306Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Pre-recorded software and manuals sold as unit; computer software that is downloadable from a remote computer site for instructing businesses and individuals on a wide variety of topics; computer software for providing access to, providing information to, and obtaining information from a global computer network, internal computer networks, and/or local and wide area networks; and computer software that allows broadcasting of video over worldwide communication networks; computer software, and manuals sold as a unit, for the organization display, communication, searching or analysis of marketing or advertising data, for the creation, formatting, communication or printing of graphical or multimedia displays, for software design, or for design of web sites and portal web sites | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |