USPTO serial 75880344
EPROMPTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2751608Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 19, 2003
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EPROMPTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Rancho Santa Fe, CA
Rancho Santa Fe, CA
Rancho Santa Fe, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR PROVIDING ELECTRONIC MAIL CAPABILITIES, FOR USE BY INDIVIDUAL COMPUTER USERS, NAMELY, COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR MANAGING, VIEWING AND EDITING FILES, DOCUMENTS, ELECTRONIC MAIL MESSAGES AND PRIVATE NETWORK AND GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK COMMUNICATIONS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 20, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2024 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 19, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2012 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2012 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 8, 2012 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 8, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2008 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Oct 13, 2008 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 16, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 27, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 7, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 1, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 1, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 20, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 21, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2001 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 9, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 2, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 2, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 5, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |