USPTO serial 75880602
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARTIN P HOFFMAN
MARTIN P HOFFMAN HOFFMAN, WASSON & GITLER, PC2361 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWYSTE 522ARLINGTON, VA 22202| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | glass containers, namely, nail polish bottles, perfume bottles, and cosmetic jars, sold empty | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 4, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 17, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 24, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 24, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 17, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 24, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 24, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2001 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 24, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 3, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 19, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 1, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 30, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 20, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |