USPTO serial 75880710
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roy S. Gordet
ROY S GORDET1095 MARKET ST STE 606SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and computer software for transporting data and for managing data communications between storage area networks | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2001 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 1, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 1, 2001 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 1, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 1, 2001 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 30, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 29, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 27, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 25, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |