USPTO serial 75880871
I-N-C-L-U-S-I-V-I-T-Y
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 5, 2002
- Examiner
- ALI, STEPHANIE MARIE
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with I-N-C-L-U-S-I-V-I-T-Y?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Inclusivity Consulting Group, Inc.
PORTLAND, OR
Other trademarks owned by Inclusivity Consulting Group, Inc.
Inclusivity Consulting Group, Inc.
PORTLAND, OR
Other trademarks owned by Inclusivity Consulting Group, Inc.
Inclusivity Consulting Group, Inc.
PORTLAND, OR
Other trademarks owned by Inclusivity Consulting Group, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul L. Havel
PAUL L HAVEL MILLER NASH LLP3500 US BANCORP TWR111 SW 5TH AVEPORTLAND, OR 97204-3699Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | CONSULTATION SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF ASSISTING ORGANIZATIONS ON HOW TO RECOGNIZE PEOPLE AND EMPLOYEES AS THEIR MOST VALUABLE RESOURCE AND FOCUSING ON DEVELOPING PERFORMANCE-STRENGTHENING, VALUE-CENTERED LEADERSHIP AND BUILDING ORGANIZATIONS THAT FOSTER DIVERSITY | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 1, 1989 |
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING TRAINING PROGRAMS TO ORGANIZATIONS AND THEIR LEADERS ON HOW TO DEVELOP SKILLS TO RECOGNIZE PEOPLE AND EMPLOYEES AS THEIR MOST VALUABLE RESOURCE AND FOCUSING ON DEVELOPING PERFORMANCE-STRENGTHENING, VALUE-CENTERED LEADERSHIP AND BUILDING ORGANIZATIONS THAT FOSTER DIVERSITY | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 1, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Inclusivity Consulting Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Inclusivity Consulting Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Inclusivity Consulting Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named I-N-C-L-U-S-I-V-I-T-Y
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 5, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 13, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 13, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 24, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 16, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 27, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2001 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |