USPTO serial 75881178
HOCKEY.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARCY, AMY ALFIERI
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HOCKEY.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS E. ANDERSON
THOMAS E ANDERSON GIFFORD, KRASS, GROH, SPRINKLE, ET ALPO BOX 70212701 TROY CTR DR STE 330TROY, MI 48007-7021Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, hockey jerseys, T-shirts, sweatshirts, warm-up suits, hockey pants, socks, turtleneck shirts, long underwear and jackets | ACTIVE | Nov 30, 1999 |
| 028 | Sporting equipment, namely, hockey pucks, hockey sticks, hockey helmets, goalie masks, hockey gloves, hockey skates; in-line skates, hockey nets, protective equipment, namely, shin guards, mouth guards and chest protectors | ACTIVE | Nov 30, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DANIEL J. PHILBRICK
- Other trademarks owned by Hockey. Com, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by PERANI, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named HOCKEY.COM
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 5, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 20, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 19, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 25, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 19, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 19, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 24, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 9, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 9, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 14, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 18, 2000 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |