USPTO serial 75881216
MONEYTOOLS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, LAVERNE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MONEYTOOLS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julie D Cromer
JULIE D CROMER BAKER & MCKENZIE1 PRUDENTIAL PLZ130 E RANDOLPH DR STE 3500CHICAGO, IL 60601Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NUMERIX LLC
- Other trademarks owned by NUMERIX LLC
- Other trademarks owned by NumeriX, Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named MONEYTOOLS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 4, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 12, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 8, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 9, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 15, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 26, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |