USPTO serial 75881245
GORISK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BOULTON, KELLY F
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GORISK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark D. Godler
MARK D GODLER KAYE, SCHOLER, FIERMAN, HAYS & HANDLER425 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FEATURING MULTIMEDIA IDENTIFICATION, FORECASTING, ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT OF INSURANCE AND INSURANCE-RELATED FINANCIAL PRODUCTS, SERVICES AND NEEDS, AND OF POTENTIAL LIABILITIES AND EXPOSURES TO LIABILITIES | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, CREATING AND MAINTAINING INTERACTIVE COMPUTER DATABASES FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF INSURANCE SERVICES AND PRODUCTS; PROVIDING INSURANCE INFORMATION INCLUDING INSURANCE CONSULTATION SERVICES THROUGH A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; ASSISTING OTHERS IN COMMUNICATING WITH, AND PURCHASING INSURANCE PRODUCTS AND SERVICES FROM, SELLERS OF SUCH PRODUCTS AND SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |