USPTO serial 75881264
INTIKA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GILBERT, REBECCA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INTIKA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Richmond, Surrey TW9 2PR, GB
Richmond, Surrey TW9 2PR, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frank P. Presta
FRANK P PRESTA NIXON & VANDERHYE1100 N GLEBE RDARLINGTON, VA 22201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | MARKETING SERVICES; MARKETING CONSULTANCY AND ADVISORY SERVICES; BUSINESS MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION CONSULTING SERVICES; DIRECT MAIL ADVERTISING; DISSEMINATION OF ADVERTISING MATTER; MARKET ANALYSIS AND MARKET RESEARCH; MARKETING STUDIES; COMPILATION OF INFORMATION INTO COMPUTER DATABASES; SYSTEMIZATION OF INFORMATION INTO COMPUTER DATABASES; COST PRICE ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL INFORMATION; PROVISION OF INFORMATION RELATING TO BUSINESS, COMMERCIAL, TRADE AND MARKETING; ADVERTISING AND PUBLICITY SERVICES; BUSINESS INTRODUCTION SERVICES; INTERMEDIARY SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |