USPTO serial 75881645
BLANKIEKEEPERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2948239Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 10, 2005
- Examiner
- ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BLANKIEKEEPERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ALLISON PARK, PA
ALLISON PARK, PA
ALLISON PARK, PA
ALLISON PARK, PA
ALLISON PARK, PA
ALLISON PARK, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GRANT E. COFFIELD
GRANT E. COFFIELD ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC600 GRANT STREET, 44TH FLOORPITTSBURGH, PA 15219UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | BAGS AND OTHER CONTAINERS MADE OF NATURAL OR SYNTHETIC FIBERS NAMELY DUFFEL BAGS, OVERNIGHT BAGS, TRAVEL BAGS, PILLOW BAGS, CLUTCH BAGS, TOTE BAGS ALL FOR CARRYING PILLOWS AND BLANKETS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RUNCO, GARY
- Other trademarks owned by RUNCO, GARY
- Other trademarks owned by RUNCO, GARY
- Other trademarks owned by RUNCO, PATRICIA
- Other trademarks owned by RUNCO, PATRICIA
- Other trademarks owned by RUNCO, PATRICIA
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Similar marks named BLANKIEKEEPERS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 10, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 10, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 22, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 18, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2004 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 31, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 2, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 2, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 29, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 2, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 2, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 10, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 27, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |