USPTO serial 75882227
FINDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANAHAN, PATRICK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FINDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
London SW1E 6LD, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
D. Bruce Prout
D BRUCE PROUT CHRISTIE, PARKER & HALE, LLPPOST OFFICE BOX 7068PASADENA, CA 91109-7068UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN THE DETECTION OF FRAUD | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | BUSINESS MANAGEMENT; BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION; OFFICE FUNCTIONS; FISCAL ADMINISTRATION; ALL CONCERNED WITH THE DETECTION OF FRAUD | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | FINANCIAL AFFAIRS; NAMELY, FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; MONETARY AFFAIRS; NAMELY, FINANCIAL ANALYSIS AND CONSULTATION, FINANCIAL RESEARCH; INSURANCE SERVICES, NAMELY, INSURANCE CONSULTATION, ACTUARIAL SERVICES; ALL IN THE FIELD OF THE DETECTION OF FRAUD | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | EDUCATION AND TRAINING; NAMELY, CONDUCTING CLASSES, SEMINARS, CONFERENCES AND WORKSHOPS CONCERNING THE DETECTION OF FRAUD; INVESTIGATIONS AND THE GATHERING OF FINANCIAL INTELLIGENCE IN FRAUD RELATED MATTERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | FRAUD DETECTION AND INVESTIGATION SERVICES; INTELLIGENCE GATHERING IN THE FIELD OF FINANCE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Armor Holdings, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named FINDS
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 3, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 5, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 25, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |