USPTO serial 75882230
DIY MORTGAGECOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 20, 2002
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DIY MORTGAGECOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Wen H. Wang
Wen H. Wang Baker & Hostetler LLP1900 East 9th StreetSuite 3200CLEVELAND, OH 44114-2652Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | PROVIDING MORTGAGE LOANS TO BUYERS OF RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Feb 5, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 20, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 21, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 16, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 1, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 24, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 24, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 26, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |