USPTO serial 75882451
HC-TECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HC-TECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
93300 Aubervilliers, FR
93300 Aubervilliers, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN CLARKE HOLMAN,
JOHN CLARKE HOLMAN JACOBSON HOLMAN400 SEVENTH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | Automotive greases, greases for machines, general purpose lubrication greases and lubricants for vehicles; motor oil, industrial oil; all purpose lubricants and fuels for motor vehicles, namely, gasoline, fuels for diesel engines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2006 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 16, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 11, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 11, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 29, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 31, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 28, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 19, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 9, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 25, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |