USPTO serial 75882633
STURDIWARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STURDIWARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EZRA SUTTON
PLZ 9 900 RTE 9WOODBRIDGE, NJ 07095UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | distributorships, mail order services, retail store services and computerized on-line ordering and retail services featuring food containers of all kinds, including serving trays, platters, plates, bowls and lids related thereto | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 9, 2002 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 18, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 29, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |