USPTO serial 75882835
CHIC-N-FRIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2826794Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 30, 2004
- Examiner
- MAHONEY, PAULA M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CHIC-N-FRIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mt. Bethel, PA
Mt. Bethel, PA
Mt. Bethel, PA
Georgetown, DE
WILMINGTON, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles N. Quinn
Charles N. Quinn FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP2000 MARKET STREET, 20TH FLOORPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | shaped breaded poultry ready for cooking sold at wholesale and not sold directly to consumers or at retail | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Pocono Foods, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Pocono Foods, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Pocono Foods, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by TOWNSENDS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by OMTRON USA LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named CHIC-N-FRIES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | E15R | TEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Mar 30, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 6, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 17, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 1, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 1, 2003 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 21, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 10, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 9, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 4, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 22, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 22, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jun 13, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 3, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 3, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 11, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |