USPTO serial 75882925
MRCAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MRCAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Yamatokoriyama-shi, Nara, JP
Yamatokoriyama-shi, Nara, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey H. Kaufman
JEFFREY H KAUFMAN OBLON SPIVAK MCCLELLAND MAIER & NEUSTADT1940 DUKE STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRONIC MACHINES AND INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY, MEASURING APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY, TOOL PRESETTERS AND WORK PRESETTERS; ELECTRICAL POWER DISTRIBUTION AND CONTROL MACHINES AND INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY, OPERATION PANELS FOR MACHINE TOOLS, NAMELY AUTOMATED TOOL PRESETTERS FOR USE IN THE OPERATION AND CONTROL OF ELECTRONIC MACHINES; ELECTRONIC SWITCHES, NAMELY, NUMERICAL CONTROL UNITS FOR USE IN MACHINES, MACHINE UNITS AND INDUSTRIAL ROBOTS; PRERECORDED COMPUTER SOFTWARE, NAMELY, PRE-RECORDED COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR CONTROL OF METAL WORKING MACHINES AND TOOLS AND THEIR PERIPHERALS, PRE-RECORDED COMPUTER OPERATING PROGRAMS FOR USE IN MACHINE OPERATION, SIMULATORS FOR MACHINE OPERATION AND CONTROL, MONITOR APPARATUS, ELECTRONIC SIGNAL TRANSMITTERS, COMPUTERS AND PARTS AND FITTING THEREFOR; DATA STORAGE INPUT AND OUTPUT DEVICES FOR CNC CONTROL MACHINE TOOLS, NAMELY, BLANK CARTRIDGES, CD-ROMS, OPTICAL DISKS AND MAGNETIC CARDS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 25, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 15, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 25, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 16, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 5, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 7, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 2, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 5, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 5, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |