Drawing for QUIKLINK

USPTO serial 75883191

QUIKLINK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
WAHLBERG, STACY B
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with QUIKLINK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Erin S. Hennessy

Erin S. Hennessy K&L Gates LLP925 4th Avenue, Suite 2900Seattle, WA 98104-1158UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042PROVIDING WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONNECTIONS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK, LOCAL AREA NETWORKS, AND WIDE AREA NETWORKSACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 12, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 12, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Oct 21, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 21, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 30, 2005UNDCUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED
May 19, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 30, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 24, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 19, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Feb 18, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 2, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2004IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED
Apr 25, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Apr 15, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 15, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 8, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 8, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Mar 27, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 16, 2001AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Jan 29, 2001IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Jul 26, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 5, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance