USPTO serial 75883284
WALTZING MATILDA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WALTZING MATILDA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DANA L. TANGREN
DANA L. TANGREN WORKMAN NYDEGGER60 EAST SOUTH TEMPLE1000 EAGLE GATE TOWERSALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail and wholesale store services featuring clothing, footwear, headgear, watches, clocks, ornaments, precious stones, precious metals, badges, figurines, statutes, household items, furniture, apparatus for lighting, heating, cooking, refrigerating, drying and ventilating, textile goods, yarns, threads, stationery, paper and cardboard goods, books, printed matter, fashion goods, jewelry, souvenirs, cosmetics, toiletries, perfumes, body care preparations, substances for laundry use, cleaning, polishing, and scouring preparations, pharmaceutical, veterinary, and sanitary preparations, disinfectants, insecticides, games, sporting goods, gymnastic goods, tents, tarpaulins, toys, playthings, musical instruments, food, beverages, agricultural products, leather goods, bags, cases, luggage, motion picture a, films, videos, cassettes, tapes, recording discs, CD's, cinematographic goods, tobacco smokers' articles; the aforesaid retail store services available through computer communications and interactive electronic media; advertising services namely, placing and preparing television, radio, and film advertisements for others; advertising services namely, production of television, radio, and film commercials; business management; market analysis and research services; publicity agent services, public relations, and publication of publicity texts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by JOLLY SWAGMEN PTY LTD
- Other trademarks owned by WM PRODUCTIONS PTY LTD
- Other trademarks owned by WM PRODUCTIONS PTY LTD
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named WALTZING MATILDA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 19, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 25, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 20, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 14, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 27, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 6, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 31, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 1, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 31, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 16, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |