USPTO serial 75883393
OLSEN PONTOON RAMP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 19, 2002
- Examiner
- LUTHEY, LYNN A
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with OLSEN PONTOON RAMP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
NEW YORK MILLS, MN
NEW YORK MILLS, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CURTIS V. HARR
CURTIS V HARRP O BOX 2842FARGO, ND 58108-2842UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | METAL RAMPS FOR USE WITH WATER VEHICLES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 27, 2008 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 22, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 19, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 21, 2001 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 21, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 10, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 26, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 29, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |