USPTO serial 75883626
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PATRICIA A. WILCZYNSKI
PATRICIA A WILCZYNSKI SCULLY, SCOTT, MURPHY & PRESSER400 GARDEN CITY PLZGARDEN CITY, NY 11530-0299UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software programs that monitor activity on a computer, namely, computer software that monitors communications between computers and the global information network; computer software programs for examining the performance of, information on and content of computer drives, zip drives, floppy drives, optical and magneto-optical disk drives, magnetic disk drives, computer memory storage drives and network drives attached to a computer; computer software programs for searching, detecting, examining, printing and copying files, deleted files, unallocated disk space, file slack and RAM slack; computer software for searching, detecting, examining, printing and copying words, text, images, graphic files, image files, hidden image files and text files; computer software for accessing and searching a computer from a second computer via parallel link | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 22, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |