Drawing for HANDANGO.COM

USPTO serial 75883957

HANDANGO.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LINCOSKI JR, JOHN T
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HANDANGO.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ELISABETH A. EVERT

ELISABETH A EVERT SIDLEY & AUSTIN717 N HARWOOD ST STE 3400DALLAS, TX 75201-6538UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035computerized online retail and ordering services in the fields of handheld computer devices, personal digital assistant devices, computer hardware, land and cellular telephones, and accessories for use in connection with software platforms in use with same, and computer peripherals, namely, modems, cases, power cords, styluses and the likeACTIVE
038providing on-line information regarding resources for wireless facsimile mail services and wireless digital messaging services, and for multiple user access and telecommunications connections to a global computer information networkACTIVE
042designing and implementing custom configurations of handheld computer devices and personal digital assistant devices for others, hosting a website featuring information and links to downloadable third-party computer software relating to handheld computer devices, personal digital assistant devices and software platforms for use with same, providing a website featuring news and information relating to handheld computer devices, personal digital assistant devices and software platforms for use with same, and providing technical consultation and support services related to sameACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 13, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 16, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 23, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 29, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 9, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 9, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 27, 2001REINREINSTATED
Mar 28, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 28, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 12, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 7, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 25, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance