USPTO serial 75883971
MODELIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LINCOSKI JR, JOHN T
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MODELIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CH-1001 Lausanne, CH
CH-1001 Lausanne, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert C. Faber
ROBERT C FABER OSTROLENK, FABER, GERB & SOFFEN1180 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-8403UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | machines for printing and processing paper and cardboard for the printing and packaging industry, machines for foil stamping and hot and cold embossing | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | computer programs used to control the machines for printing and processing paper and cardboard for the printing and packaging industry, as well as for the machines for foil stamping and hot and cold embossing | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | installation, maintenance and repair services related to machines for printing and processing paper and cardboard for the printing and packaging industry | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | technical training, namely theoretical and practical training courses in the use of printing and packaging machines, publication of training books, distributing video cassettes and course material used in connection with theoretical and practical courses in the use of printing and packaging machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | technical support services, namely providing technical expertise, analysis and assistance, and troubleshooting, provided via global computer network, telephone and e-mail for the machines for printing and processing paper and cardboard for the printing and packaging industry | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BOBST S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by BOBST S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MODELIS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 21, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 25, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 7, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 25, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 30, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 26, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 1, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 12, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 31, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 8, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2001 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Dec 5, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |