USPTO serial 75884027
UNLOCK THE LEGEND...
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with UNLOCK THE LEGEND...?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | life preservers, video recordings featuring safe boating in the canals of the state of New York | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | jewelry, namely pins of non-precious metals | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | plastic shopping bags, pens, posters and paper banners | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | sports bottles sold empty, and thermal insulated tote bags for food and beverages | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | clothing, namely hats, caps, sun visors, shirts, polo shirts, tank tops, T-shirts, sweat suits, sweat shirts, sweat pants, cloth bibs, jackets, wind resistant jackets, wind shirts | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Dissemination of advertising | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by New York State Canal Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by New York State Canal Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named UNLOCK THE LEGEND...
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 10, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 8, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 16, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 25, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 10, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 5, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 8, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 1, 2003 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| May 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 2, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2003 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 4, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 25, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |