USPTO serial 75884126
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARVIN E. JACOBS
MARVIN E JACOBS KOPPEL & JACOBS2151 ALESSANDRO DR STE 215VENTURA, CA 93001UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | ANIMAL IDENTIFICATION KIT COMPRISED OF INSTRUCTIONS FOR OBTAINING DOG'S NOSE PRINT, INFORMATION QUESTIONNAIRE REQUESTING INFORMATION ON OWNER AND DOG OWNER'S CARD AND DOG ID CARD FOR ATTACHMENT TO COLLAR CONTAINING IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION AND DOG'S NOSE PRINT | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 3, 2001 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 20, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 25, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 25, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2001 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |