USPTO serial 75884318
THE ORIGINAL COMFORT BELT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 26, 2002
- Examiner
- LEE, DOUGLAS
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE ORIGINAL COMFORT BELT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3X2, CA
Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3X2, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donald H. Zarley
DONALD H ZARLEY ZARLEY, MCKEE, THOMTE, VOORHEES & SEASE801 GRAND AVE - STE 3200DES MOINES, IA 50309UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Men's clothing accessories, namely belts | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 31, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 24, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 26, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 1, 2001 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 1, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 30, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 15, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |