USPTO serial 75884436
IMPLI.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 607
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MADDEN, ANNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IMPLI.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lalitha Mani
LALITHA MANI PERKINS COIE1201 3RD AVE STE 4800SEATTLE, WA 98101-3099UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Kiosks and automated transaction machines and computer software for operating them for use in electronic transaction processing, interactive and multimedia entertainment services, online games, electronic ticket purchasing, displaying video advertisements, and providing online links to news, sports, weather, current events and retail sites | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 2002 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Aug 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 1, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 29, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 29, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 22, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 22, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 5, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 4, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 11, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 30, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |