Drawing for THE BEREN CENTER FOR JEWISH CONTINUITY

USPTO serial 75884789

THE BEREN CENTER FOR JEWISH CONTINUITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2948242Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 10, 2005
Examiner
KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with THE BEREN CENTER FOR JEWISH CONTINUITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SAMUEL Z. BROWN

SAMUEL Z. BROWN LAW OFFICES OF SAMUEL Z. BROWN205 EAST KENNEDY BOULEVARDLAKEWOOD, NJ 08701UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Educational services, namely, providing seminars, conferences and workshops in the field of Jewish culture and religious heritage, and Torah study, and distributing course materials in connection therewithSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDDec 16, 2004
042Association services, namely, promoting the interests of scholars of Jewish literatureSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDDec 16, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 11, 2015CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9
Sep 29, 2011NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED
Sep 29, 2011C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Sep 29, 2011815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED
Sep 27, 2011EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED
Mar 28, 2011PR23POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15
Mar 17, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Mar 2, 2011E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED
Feb 14, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 14, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
May 10, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 22, 2005REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 18, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 16, 2005CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED
Feb 15, 2005SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Feb 2, 2005IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Feb 2, 2005EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Sep 15, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Aug 23, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 20, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Jul 29, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Mar 2, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Feb 19, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Feb 19, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 17, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Aug 25, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 20, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Apr 16, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Feb 18, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Feb 18, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 20, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 28, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 8, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 26, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 1, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 15, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 16, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 9, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance