USPTO serial 75891844
I KID
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KAZAZIAN, MICHAEL H
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with I KID?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CORY M AMRON
CORY M AMRON VORYS SATER SEYMOUR1828 L ST NW FL 11WASHINGTON, DC 20036-5109UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Doll's clothing; toys, namely plush toys, stuff toys, mechanical action toys, electric action toys, non-riding transportation toys, children's multiple activity toys, doll's accessories and doll's furniture; games, namely, board games, chess games, card games, action skill games, party games, arcade games, hand-held unit electronic games, target games, manipulative games; body-building equipment, namely, barbells, dumbbells; sporting equipment, namely, baseball bats, hockey sticks, golf sticks; protective devices for sporting, namely, swim goggles, baseball masks; decorations, namely, craft sets for decorating, balloons, egg decorating kits, gift package decorations made of plastic, decorations for Christmas trees; fishing equipment, namely, fishing rods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 25, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2000 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |