USPTO serial 75893137
CATENA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRENCH, CURTIS W
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CATENA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John W. Crittenden
JOHN W CRITTENDEN COOLEY GODWARD LLPONE MARITIME PLZ 20TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3580UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER HARDWARE, NAMELY, TELECOMMUNICATIONS HARDWARE FOR USE IN THE TRANSMISSION OF VOICE, DATA AND VIDEO OR TELEPHONE NETWORKS AND IP/ATM PACKET NETWORKS; TELEPHONE MESSAGING SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF LINE CARDS, NETWORK INTERFACE CARDS, AND COMPUTER HARDWARE FOR USE IN CENTRAL OFFICE AND REMOTE ACCESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS; INTEGRATED BROADBAND ACCESS SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND NETWORK COMPUTER OPERATING SYSTEMS AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE RELATED THERETO FOR THE AGGREGATION AND TRANSMISSION OF VOICE, DATA, AND VIDEO OVER TELEPHONE NETWORKS AND IP/ATM PACKET NETWORKS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 2, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 6, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 6, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 11, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 5, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2001 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |