Drawing for EFUSION

USPTO serial 75897560

EFUSION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KING, LINDA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EFUSION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ANN K FORD

ANN K FORD PIPER RUDNICK LLP1200 NINETEENTH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-2412UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035promoting the goods and services of others by placing advertisements and promotional displays in an electronic web site accessed through a global computer network which offers long distance telecommunications service over computer networksACTIVE
038Telecommunications services, namely, network services that provide dial-up and broadband network subscribers with incoming call notification while on-line on a network, voice messaging and call management options for accepting and/or rejecting voice, data and video calls without disconnecting from the network, multimedia call control functions, routing options, automated call deflection and computer telephony integration; telecommunication services which enables simultaneous voice communication while maintaining a computer network connectionACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 6, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 6, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 2, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 10, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 21, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 3, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 1, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 28, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Sep 27, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Mar 26, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Mar 26, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 8, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Mar 6, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Mar 6, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Sep 6, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Mar 4, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jul 23, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jun 17, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Jun 17, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Aug 8, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Apr 4, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Apr 2, 2001ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Mar 30, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 20, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 16, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 17, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 16, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance