Drawing for MODERN BRIDE

USPTO serial 75899754

MODERN BRIDE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
REIHNER, DAVID
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MODERN BRIDE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ERIC E GISOLFI

ERIC E GISOLFI SABIN BERMAN & GOULD LLPFOUR TIMES SQNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035ONLINE ORDERING SERVICES FEATURING PRODUCTS FOR THE WEDDING CONSUMERS, NAMELY, CAMERAS, CANDY, ACCESSORIES FOR BRIDES, GARTERS, HAIRPIECES, CHAMPAGNE, FRUITS, CAKE ACCESSORIES, RECEPTION PLACE CARDS, GUEST BOOKS, PENS, CANDLES, CANDLE HOLDERS, JEWELRY, ACCESSORIES FOR FLOWER GIRLS, ACCESSORIES FOR RING BEARERS, WEDDING FAVORS AND GIFT ITEMS, NAMELY, BUBBLES, SOAPS AND COSMETICS, SINGLE USE CAMERAS, BOARD GAMES AND SMALL TOYS, KEY CHAINS, MONEY CLIPS, LEATHER TRAVEL BAGS, MANICURE SET, CIGAR CUTTERS, KEY RINGS, FLASKS, BUSINESS CARD HOLDERS, GROOMING KITS, PERSONALIZED STATIONERY, PENS AND PENCILS, PERSONALIZED KEEPSAKES, PICTURE FRAMES, RIBBONS AND BUBBLES, ALL AVAILABLE THROUGH THE USE OF THE INTERNETACTIVE
038PROVIDING CHAT ROOMS AND BULLETIN BOARDS FOR THE TRANSMISSION OF MESSAGES AND INTERACTION AMONG OTHER COMPUTER USERS CONCERNING TOPICS OF INTEREST TO FUTURE BRIDES, MARRIED INDIVIDUALS, AND FRIENDS AND RELATIVES OF INDIVIDUALS TO BE MARRIED OR RECENTLY MARRIEDACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 10, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 22, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 28, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 8, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 19, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 13, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Jun 7, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 26, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 2, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 26, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 30, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 9, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 24, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 22, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 13, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance