USPTO serial 75902574
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Melbourne, FL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John E. Ottaviani
JOHN E OTTAVIANI EDWARDS & ANGELL LLPPO BOX 55874BOSTON, MA 02205UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | A wireless messaging, tracking and dispatching system for vehicles, consisting of a computer terminal and a transceiver unit and software that is installed in the vehicle and office software that is installed in the dispatch office | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 27, 2002 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Aug 21, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 11, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |