Drawing for MOBILE WORKSTATION

USPTO serial 75902574

MOBILE WORKSTATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
YARD, JOHN S
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MOBILE WORKSTATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John E. Ottaviani

JOHN E OTTAVIANI EDWARDS & ANGELL LLPPO BOX 55874BOSTON, MA 02205UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009A wireless messaging, tracking and dispatching system for vehicles, consisting of a computer terminal and a transceiver unit and software that is installed in the vehicle and office software that is installed in the dispatch officeACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 11, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Apr 7, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 24, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Nov 27, 2002EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Aug 21, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jun 17, 2002CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Jun 11, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 11, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jun 11, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jun 5, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
May 23, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 23, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 19, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 5, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 3, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 5, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 29, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance