USPTO serial 75903653
RIDENTITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, ROBERT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RIDENTITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
D 10409 Berlin, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Catherine M. Clayton
CATHERINE M CLAYTON PENNIE & EDMONDS LLP1155 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-2711UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Telecommunication services, namely electronic transmission of text, images, speech and sound in all media, and providing interactive electronic media communications services, namely, electronic transmission of data via computers, telephones and/or a global computer network; providing an on-line database to assist others in locating and navigating to information, goods and services via a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Collection, compilation, publication, navigation to and presentation of news and information in the fields of finance, economics, politics, science, art, technology, engineering and entertainment for presentation on and distribution via a global computer network; computer education training in connection with locating information, goods and services via a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, designing and providing databases featuring information in the fields of finance, economics, politics, science, art, technology, engineering and entertainment, and links to the web pages of others; computer software design for data processing; information technology services, including web page design and programming services for others, web site hosting for others, providing an on-line computer database in the field of computer consultation, and providing information in the field of computer consultation via a global computer network; providing and operating a search engine for obtaining data on a global computer network; information brokerage services in the fields of computers and computer software; and consultation, training and advice in connection with navigating through and locating information, goods and services via a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 9, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 13, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |