USPTO serial 75903828
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary Boney Denison
MARY BONEY DENISON MANELLI DENISON & SELTER PLLC2000 M ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Blank magnetic data carriers and data strips; recording media, namely, blank audio tapes, audio and video cassettes and compact discs; data processors and computers; scientific apparatus and instruments, namely, tickets, vouchers, paper tokens and personal documents, all of which are magnetically coded; magnetic coded card readers, magnetic card encoders and decoders; scientific apparatus and instruments for controlling access to restricted areas, namely, magnetically coded tickets, cards, personal documents, unlocking units; electronic security products, namely tokens, tickets, cards, servers, and encryption units, blank smart cards, printers for printing a sequence of numbers | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Paper cards, tickets, vouchers, paper tokens and documents, bearing visually encoded information, for use in business transactions, namely documents of commercial, security or monetary value; printed control tickets, control tokens made of paper for use as admissions passes; manual franking machines; paper tapes and cards for the recording of computer data; printed matter, namely stock certificates, bond certificates, share certificates, bank notes, passports, concert tickets and other tickets, paper tokens, personal papers and passes; numbering machines, embossers | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 6, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 28, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 23, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 29, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 9, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 20, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 17, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |