USPTO serial 75904191
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rosemary S. Tarlton
ROSEMARY S TARLTON MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP425 MARKET STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2482UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware; computer accessories, namely keyboards, memories, modems, cables, power protection devices, namely voltage surge protectors, communications servers, printers, scanners, projectors, data storage CD ROM, computer disc, and digital video disc drives, monitors and audio components, namely speakers | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Series of books and printed instructional materials on the subject of computer software, hardware, computer supplies and peripherals | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Dissemination of advertising matter for others, and promotion of the goods and services of others through the distribution of printed publications and electronic publications via the global communications network; telephone ordering services, mail order services, retail store services, and on-line ordering services, all in the field of computers, computer peripherals and related products | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Installation, maintenance and repair of computers, computer peripherals and related products, keyboards, memories, modems, cables, power protection devices, namely voltage surge protectors, communications servers, printers, scanners, projectors, data storage drives, monitors and audio components, namely speakers | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 4, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 10, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 20, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 6, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 24, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 28, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |