USPTO serial 75904504
SAFE-T-NET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2886798Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 21, 2004
- Examiner
- KIM, YONG OH
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SAFE-T-NET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kathleen S. Herbert
Tactilitics, Inc.4760 Walnut StreetSuite 105Boulder, CO 80301Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | MEDICAL DEVICES IN THE NATURE OF PATIENT SAFETY PRODUCTS, NAMELY, CONTACT SENSORS USED BY MEDICAL PERSONNEL TO MONITOR FOR ADVERSE INCIDENTS IN THE CARE OF NON-CRITICAL PATIENTS | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2008 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 28, 2007 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 21, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 11, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 28, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 17, 2003 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Mar 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 25, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 5, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 7, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 24, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |