USPTO serial 75905175
HANDYMAN NETWORK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2811900Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 3, 2004
- Examiner
- BELL, MARLENE D
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HANDYMAN NETWORK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
HANDYMAN-NETWORK FRANCHISE SYSTEMS, INC.
MINNETONKA, MN
Other trademarks owned by HANDYMAN-NETWORK FRANCHISE SYSTEMS, INC.
Signal Hill, CA
Signal Hill, CA
Signal Hill, CA
Signal Hill, CA
HANDYMAN FRANCHISE SYSTEMS, INC.
LONG BEACH, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John C. Pickerill
John C. Pickerill Fredrikson & Byron, P.A.200 South Sixth StreetSuite 4000Minneapolis, MN 55402-1425Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Maintenance, repair and construction of residential and commercial buildings and property, appliances, goods and machines, namely handyman services related to carpentry; cement work; masonry; glasswork; plumbing; painting; dry walling and plastering; titling; roofing; electrical; construction, remodeling, maintenance and repair of and related to storage containers, buildings and fixtures, closets, garages, shelving, baby proofing, leaks, re-caulking, fixtures, namely plumbing, lighting, electrical, and household fixtures, bathrooms, kitchens, furniture; remodeling, reorganizing furniture and household items; reorganizing, attaching and hanging art and fixtures, window and wall coverings, roofs; floors and the like | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HANDYMAN-NETWORK FRANCHISE SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Kaskavalciyan, Brian
- Other trademarks owned by Kaskavalciyan, Brian
- Other trademarks owned by Fall, Thomas
- Other trademarks owned by Fall, Thomas
- Other trademarks owned by HANDYMAN FRANCHISE SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named HANDYMAN NETWORK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Feb 5, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 8, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 17, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 16, 2003 | 1.AA | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Oct 16, 2003 | 1.AA | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Jul 16, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 11, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 10, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 20, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2001 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jul 17, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |