USPTO serial 75909696
BRAINPRINT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALI, STEPHANIE MARIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BRAINPRINT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gailyc C. Sonia,
MICHAEL K BARRON ESQ NIXON PEABODY LLP100 SUMMER STBOSTON, MA 02110-2131UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Analyzing the effects of drugs on the brains of animals | ACTIVE | Aug 13, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 27, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 20, 2005 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 3, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 20, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2003 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jul 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 30, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 7, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 3, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 20, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 21, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 4, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |