USPTO serial 75913804
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jay A. Bondell
JAY A BONDELL SCHWEITZER CORNMAN GROSS & BONDELL LLP292 MADISON AVE19TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10017| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Swimmer delivery vehicle, namely, a surface planing wet submersible watercraft | ACTIVE | May 27, 2004 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 10, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 12, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 20, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 8, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2004 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 25, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 3, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 20, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |