USPTO serial 75914759
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Haverhill, MA
HAVERHILL, MA
HAVERHILL, MA
HAVERHILL, MA
GLOBALWARE SOLUTIONS MASSACHUSETTS, INC.
HAVERHILL, MA
Other trademarks owned by GLOBALWARE SOLUTIONS MASSACHUSETTS, INC.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS C. O'KONSKI
JOHN F MCKENNA CESARI AND MCKENNA LLP88 BLACK FALCON AVEBOSTON, MA 02210UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | SOFTWARE PACKAGING, NAMELY PACKAGING SOFTWARE TO THE ORDER AND SPECIFICATION OF OTHERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 30, 2000 |
| 039 | SOFTWARE PACKAGING, NAMELY PACKAGING SOFTWARE AND INFORMATION-BASED PRODUCTS FOR TRANSPORTATION | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 30, 2000 |
| 040 | SOFTWARE MANUFACTURING, NAMELY MANUFACTURING SOFTWARE AND INFORMATION-BASED PRODUCTS TO THE ORDER AND SPECIFICATION OF OTHERS, NAMELY, BOOKS, MANUALS, COMPUTER DISKS AND OTHER COMPUTER STORAGE MEDIA | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 30, 2000 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 25, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 5, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 4, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 1, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 9, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 21, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 9, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |