USPTO serial 75916567
COCOAPRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEIPZIG, MARC J
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COCOAPRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leslie K. Mitchell
LESLIE K MITCHELL FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO30 ROCKEFELLER PLZNEW YORK, NY 10112-3801UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat, fish, poultry and game, sea foods, processed, preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables, dairy based beverages, dairy based dips; yogurt, mousses, chocolate milk; milk; half and half milk and cream mixture; and milk-based beverage containing coffee, soups, sandwich spreads, namely, chocolate spread and peanut butter spread, salads except macaroni, rice and pasta salad; vegetable salads; garden salads; and fruit salads, fruit-based fillings for cakes and pies, fruit-based snack foods; and potato-based snack foods | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Chilled desserts, namely, frozen confections, frozen custards, frozen yogurt, fruit ice, gelatins, ice cream, parfaits, puddings, sherbert and sorbet, milk shakes; and ice milk; rice salads; pasta salads; and macaroni salads; custard-based fillings for cakes and pies; and chocolate-based fillings for cakes and pies; rice-based snack foods; cereal-based snack foods; and wheat-based snack foods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 28, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 27, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 7, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 31, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 8, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 13, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 2, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 17, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 4, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 21, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 17, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |