USPTO serial 75922747
FRONT ROW CENTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERRY, KIMBERLY B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FRONT ROW CENTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
MINNEAPOLIS, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ERIK HILDEBRANDT
ERIK HILDEBRANDT CLEARED HOT MEDIA INC10390 118TH ST NSTILLWATER, MN 55082UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | PRINT MEDIA/BOOKS/CALENDARS/POSTERS/MAGAZINE CONTENT | ACTIVE | Oct 5, 1999 |
| 025 | TEXTILE/GARMENTS--HATS/CAPS/T-SHIRTS/JACKET WEATSHlRTS | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | Oct 5, 1999 |
| 038 | BROADCASTING ON TELEVISION AND ON-AIR PROGRAMMING FOR SUBSCRIPTION TELEVISION | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | Oct 5, 1999 |
| 040 | PHOTOGRAPHY SERVICES ON FILM OR DIGITAL STILLS AND MOTION | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | Oct 5, 1999 |
| 041 | TELEVISION AND VIDEO PRODUCTION SERVICES | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | Oct 5, 1999 |
| 042 | AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY FILM AND DIGITAL ON FILM AND VIDEO IN STILL OR MOTION | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | Oct 5, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HILDEBRANDT, ERIK
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named FRONT ROW CENTER
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 29, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |